Skip to main content

Correlation vs Causation in depth - Monday 2/8/2015


Hey! Let's start out the day by recording data for the Feltron, if you haven't already. Then let me know where you are, homework-wise.

Now let's talk correlation vs. causation.

Correlation

When two things change together, we can use a fancy word and say they are correlated. When things are correlated, if we know one, we automatically know the other, at least somewhat. Here's what I mean:
If I tell you that a human exists, you don't know much about their weight. The smallest baby ever born (and survive), Rumasia Rahman, weighed a little more than 0.5 pounds (lbs). Jon Brower Minnoch, on the other hand, was the heaviest person ever, and weighed 1,400 lbs at his heaviest. That means that if all I tell you about someone is that "they are a person", and ask "what do you think they weigh?" you only know they weigh between 0.5 lbs and 1,400 lbs - though they probably weigh somewhere in between, 100-200 lbs.
However, if I tell you that the person is 6'3" (6 feet and 3 inches) tall, you know that they weigh more than the smallest human ever. In fact, you can be pretty darn sure they weigh more than 100 lbs...  I would feel comfortable betting that they weigh at least 150 lbs.
In that example, knowing the height doesn't tell us EXACTLY what someone's weight is (why?), it gives us an idea of what it would be. So we can say that height and weight are linearly correlated. Here is a scatter plot which shows an example of this:


Each person in a study on obesity is shown as a dot in the graph. The taller someone is, the further to the right their dot is. The heavier they are, the further up they are. Find the highest dot... found it? That's the heaviest person. Find the furthest dot to the right - that's the tallest person. Which dot represents the shortest person? The lightest?

Can you see how even though they don't make a line, as height goes up, weight goes up? That means there is a correlation, but not a strong one. If all the dots made a perfect line going up and to the right, that would be a correlation of 1. Here is all the information on correlation you really need:


Now it's time for a game

You have to play at least 10 rounds of... Guess the Correlation Value! Wooooo!

...Ok, there are more fun games out there, but you're learning something. Also, can you beat my record? I had a high score of 95.83%, and when I finished my tenth round, my score was 85% TRY AND BEAT THAT, YO!

When you finish AT LEAST 10 ROUNDS you have to copy and paste the "Log of Results" box into the form below so I know you did it. (There's more after the form, so keep scrolling!)

HERE IS THE LINK TO PLAY THE GAME: Guess the Correlation





Finally, let me show you the "line of best fit", the line that does the best job of showing what correlated data does. Here are some examples:


Here is data that is not linearly correlated (you can't draw a line through it that represents it well):

For homework

Probability with dice
Sample Spaces
Simple Probability

Comments

Unknown said…
Man, I'm craving a hamburger right now, just to put that out there>

Popular posts from this blog

Feltron Variables - Monday 2/1/2015

Do you have your tickets... to the gun show? #flexin #doyouevenliftbro Please complete this to show you did your homework: Loading... So, let's talk about what makes this project hard: actually collecting data. It's not hard, but somehow, doing it every day is hard. It's easy to miss a day... then two... then all the sudden, you have missed a bunch, and it's scary and you don't want to think about it, so you don't do it. So we are going to preempt all that by putting some work in today to make it hard to forget. First, we will make a Google form. I started it for you, all you is copy it and add your 4 variables . Once you have that, you are going to use a cool feature of Google Sheets to have google email you this form every day. The form will be in the email itself, so all you have to do is open the email, fill out the form, and hit enter. Here are the instructions to follow . Don't be intimidated! You just have to copy and paste some cod...

Monday 9/28

9/28/15 Monday Check in: Friday class & Homework Classwork: As long as we’re talking climate change... If someone tells you they don’t believe humans are causing it, you might want to ask them if smoking is bad for you. Why? There is as much evidence that humans are causing global warming as there is evidence that smoking causes cancer (you don’t have to click that link, I just like to put it up). Anyway, here’s a chart: It is entitled “Breakdown of the anthropic greenhouse gas emissions by gas, in billion tons carbon equivalent, in 2004” - it is a breakdown of the greenhouse gases emitted in 2004 that humans are responsible for. What’s the biggest greenhouse gas? What’s all that CO2 doing, and where does it go? A lot of it goes into the ocean, which seems better than the air, and it is... up to a point. The more CO2 in the ocean, the more acidic it gets (And the more acidic it gets, the lower its ph gets). That is fine... until it’s not. At some...

Marvin Minsky, AI, Math Education

The audio is too good to make this a gif. So, to be clear, this is the blog post for THURSDAY, 1/28. If you are looking for Tuesday's post, go back a post. I wanted to mention to you all that a mathematician and artificial intelligence researched named Marvin Minsky died on Sunday. Among lots of amazing things he did in his life, he wrote about math education for the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) project. Here is that article ; I'd like you to read it for homework. Speaking of death, check out this amazing visualization ! Finally, for classwork, I would like you to go back to Tuesday's blog post, and comment on other people's homework. Specifically do you like the charts they chose? Are they interesting? Any feedback? Homework IMPORTANT: Pick which 5 (or more) variables that you will track for the Feltron project. Think about how you will keep track of them - pen and and notebook? The Reporter App? A pedometer? Also, that Marvin Minsky article is really...